RetroSearch Browse

Fri May 6 16:41:08 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053446.html

On 5/6/05, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you; this is very good.
> 
> I added a link to it from http://www.python.org/moin/PythonDecoratorLibrary;
> please also consider adding a version number and publishing via PyPI.

Yes, this was in my plans. For the moment,  however, this is just version 0.1,
I want to wait a bit before releasing an official release.

> Incidentally, would the resulting functions be a bit faster if you compiled
> the lambda instead of repeatedly eval ing it, or does the eval overhead still
> apply?
> 
> -jJ
> 

Honestly, I don't care, since "eval" happens only once at decoration time.
There is no "eval" overhead at calling time, so I do not expect to have
problems. I am waiting for volunteers to perform profiling and
performance analysis ;)

            Michele Simionato

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053446.html below:

[Python-Dev] The decorator module