RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 5 06:38:29 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053375.html

BJörn Lindqvist wrote:

> But why stop there? Lots of functions that takes a callable as
> argument could be upgraded to use the new block syntax.

Actually, this is something that occurred to me in
potential support of a thunk implementation: It's
possible that many functions already out there which
take function arguments could *already* be used with
a thunk-based block statement, without needing to be
re-written at all.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053375.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 340: Only for try/finally?