[Shane Holloway] > And per the PEP, I think the explaining that:: > > try: > A > except: > B > else: > C > finally: > D > > is *exactly* equivalent to:: > > try: > try: > A > except: > B > else: > C > finally: > D > > Resolved all the questions about control flow for me. Well, assuming > that implementation makes the explanation truth. ;) Yup! It's not unreasonable to abbreviate it, but the second form is obvious on the face of it, and can already be written. I'm neutral on adding the slightly muddier shortcut.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4