Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Ah, someone else did post this idea first :)
I knew I was standing on the shoulders of others :)
> To deal with the generator issue, one option would be to follow up on
> Phillip's idea of a decorator to convert a generator (or perhaps any
> standard iterator) into a block iterator.
>
> I think this would also do wonders for emphasising the difference
> between for loops and block statements.
I think if we are going to emphasise the difference, a decorator does
not go far enough. To use a decorator, this *must* be valid syntax::
def gen():
try:
yield
finally:
print 'Done!'
However, that generator cannot be properly used in a for-loop. So it's
only realistically valid with the decorator, and used in a block
statement (resource suite ;)
My feeling is that the above should be a SyntaxError, as it currently
is, and that a new keyword is needed which explicitly allows the above,
and creates an object conforming to the resource protocal (as I called
it).
Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4