On 5/4/05, Alex Martelli <aleaxit at yahoo.com> wrote: > > On May 4, 2005, at 01:57, Paul Moore wrote: > > > > I can't think of a reasonable condition which wouldn't involve reading > > the file - which either involves an inner loop (and we already can't > > break out of two loops, so the third one implied by the opening block > > makes things no worse), or needs the whole file reading (which can be > > Looking for a file with a certain magicnumber in its 1st two bytes...? > > for name in filenames: > opening(name) as f: > if f.read(2) == 0xFEB0: break > > This does seem to make real-life sense to me... Yes, that'd do. I can't say I think it would be common, but it's a valid case. And the workaround is the usual messy flag variable: for name in filenames: found = False opening(name) as f: if f.read(2) == 0xFEB0: found = True if found: break Yuk. Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4