A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053288.html below:

[Python-Dev] Py_UNICODE madness

[Python-Dev] Py_UNICODE madnessGuido van Rossum gvanrossum at gmail.com
Wed May 4 05:42:11 CEST 2005
I really don't know. Effbot, MvL and/or MAL should know.

On 5/3/05, Nicholas Bastin <nbastin at opnet.com> wrote:
> 
> On May 3, 2005, at 6:44 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> 
> > I think that documentation is wrong; AFAIK Py_UNICODE has always been
> > allowed to be either 16 or 32 bits, and the source code goes through
> > great lengths to make sure that you get a link error if you try to
> > combine extensions built with different assumptions about its size.
> 
> That makes PyUnicode_FromUnicode() a lot less useful.  Well, really,
> not useful at all.
> 
> You might suggest that PyUnicode_FromWideChar is more useful, but
> that's only true on platforms that support wchar_t.
> 
> Is there no universally supported way of moving buffers of unicode data
> (as common data types, like unsigned short, etc.) into Python from C?
> 
> --
> Nick
> 
> 


-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4