On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:40:27AM -0300, rodsenra at gpr.com.br wrote: > Perhaps you could focus in 728278. It addresses some of the issues you > have addressed in 754022, but it is not properly formatted. If you could > merge into your patch the result of "set(728278)-set(754022)", it would > be great. > > These two patches have the biggest number of changes, and most significant > ones. Naturally they are also the most conflicting. > > If these two are merged, then I believe *all* webbrowser.py related > patches could be addressed and closed quickly. I am working on them. I am going to consolidate these patches along with 954628 and 1166780 into one big patch. Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ phd at phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4