RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 16 15:38:44 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052224.html

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:47:20 -0800, Guido van Rossum
<gvanrossum at gmail.com> wrote:
> But I'm not so sure now. Thinking ahead to generic types, I'd like the
> full signature to be:
> 
>   def sum(seq: sequence[T], initial: T = 0) -> T.

Would this _syntax_ work with generic types:

  def sum(seq: sequence[T], initial: T = T()) -> T.

Cheers,
Michael

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052224.html below:

[Python-Dev] Rationale for sum()'s design?