RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 15 00:20:07 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052176.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:

> But I think the logical consequence of your approach would be that
> sum([]) should raise an exception rather than return 0, which would be
> backwards incompatible. Because if the identity element has a default
> value, the default value should be used exactly as if it were
> specified explicitly.

In that case I would argue in favour of keeping it the
way it is, since...

> currently sum([1,1], 40) equals 42.

...seems quite reasonable to me. Or at least as reasonable
as anything else.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052176.html below:

[Python-Dev] Rationale for sum()'s design?