Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052156.html below:

[Python-Dev] can we stop pretending _PyTyple_Lookup is internal?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] can we stop pretending _PyTyple_Lookup is internal?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] can we stop pretending _PyTyple_Lookup is internal?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Michael,

> ... _PyType_Lookup ...

There has been discussions about copy_reg.py and at least one other place in
the standard library that needs this; it is an essential part of the
descriptor model of new-style classes.  In my opinion it should be made part
not only of the official C API but the Python one too, e.g. as a method of
'type' instances:  type(x).lookup('name')


Armin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] can we stop pretending _PyTyple_Lookup is internal?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] can we stop pretending _PyTyple_Lookup is internal?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4