RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 14 01:32:33 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052142.html

Brian Sabbey wrote:

> How about something like below?  In the same way 
> that "self" is passed "behind the scenes" as the first argument, so can 
> the thunk be.
> 
> with stopwatch() result dt:
>     a()
>     b()
> print 'it took', dt, 'seconds to compute'

Something like that would be better, yes. Maybe even just

   dt = stopwatch():
     a()
     b()

Whatever keyword is used is bound to not sound right
for some usages, so it would be best if no keyword
were needed at all.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052142.html below:

[Python-Dev] code blocks using 'for' loops and generators