On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 12:40, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > While I'm no fan of lambdas either, the removal would break too > much code (e.g. I have 407 hits in the code base I use regularly > alone). We /are/ talking Python 3000 here, right? I'm expecting all manner of code breakage in moving from Python 2 to Python 3. So while I would lament the loss of lambda too, I think its impact on my code will be in the noise compared to dealing with "optional" static typing and the truly saddening loss of <>. there's-a-wink-in-there-somewhere-ly y'rs, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20050311/21365ac2/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4