RetroSearch Browse

Fri Mar 11 16:16:34 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052043.html

Rodrigo Dias Arruda Senra wrote:
> OFF-TOPIC:
> 
> It is curious though that we choose to read an *implicit*
> True in [all(), any()] instead of an implicit False.

Actually, I think it's predicate logic's fault:

   if p(x) for any x then conclusion 1

   if q(x) for all x then conclusion 2

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at email.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052043.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding any() and all()