A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/051955.html below:

[Python-Dev] LinkedHashSet/LinkedHashMap equivalents

[Python-Dev] LinkedHashSet/LinkedHashMap equivalents [Python-Dev] LinkedHashSet/LinkedHashMap equivalentsThomas Heller theller at python.net
Wed Mar 9 21:42:32 CET 2005
[About an ordered dictionary]

> Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy) wrote:

>> Does anyone else think it would be worthwhile adding these to
>> collections, or should I just make a cookbook entry?

Greg Ward <gward at python.net> writes:
> +1 on a cookbook entry.  +0 on adding to stdlib.

"Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:

> -0 for the addition to the collections module, -1 on the specific
> name.

I cannot understand why people are against adding it to stdlib (after
the name, the implementation, and the exact place have been decided).
It's certainly a useful data type, isn't it?

Thomas

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4