A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054495.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding the 'path' module (was Re: Some RFE forreview)

[Python-Dev] Adding the 'path' module (was Re: Some RFE forreview) [Python-Dev] Adding the 'path' module (was Re: Some RFE forreview)Guido van Rossum gvanrossum at gmail.com
Tue Jun 28 10:20:19 CEST 2005
On 6/28/05, Anders J. Munch <ajm at flonidan.dk> wrote:

> Alas datetime objects do not unambiguously identify a point in time.
> datetime objects are not timestamps: They represent the related but
> different concept of _local time_, which can be good for presentation,
> but shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a persistent store.

You misunderstand the datetime module! You can have a datetime object
whose timezone is UTC; or you can have a convention in your API that
datetime objects without timezone represent UTC.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4