RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jun 22 14:32:25 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054410.html

Gareth McCaughan wrote:
> [Keith Dart:]
>>By "normal" integer I mean the mathematical definition.
> 
> Then you aren't (to me) making sense. You were distinguishing
> this from a unified int/long. So far as I can see, a unified int/long
> type *does* implement (modulo implementation limits and bugs)
> the "mathematical definition". What am I missing?

Hmm, a 'mod_int' type might be an interesting concept (i.e. a type 
that performs integer arithmetic, only each operation is carried out 
modulo some integer).

Then particular bit sizes would be simple ints, modulo the appropriate 
power of two.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054410.html below:

[Python-Dev] Is PEP 237 final -- Unifying Long Integers and Integers