RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jun 18 14:56:53 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054321.html

"Raymond Hettinger" <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> writes:

> I recommend that the proposed syntax be altered to be more parallel
> with the existing for-loop syntax to make it more parsable for both
> humans and for the compiler.

Although all your suggestions are improvments, I'm still -1 on the PEP.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  Windows installation day one.  Getting rid of the old windows 
  was easy - they fell apart quite happily, and certainly wont 
  be re-installable anywhere else.   -- http://www.linux.org.uk/diary/
                                       (not *that* sort of windows...)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054321.html below:

[Python-Dev] Propose updating PEP 284 -- Integer for-loops