Nicolas Fleury <nidoizo at yahoo.com> wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Why are you so excited about having until indented? You didn't give > > any examples with multiple occurrences. A single occurrence works just > > fine unindented, as PEP 315 has already shown. > > FWIW, I must say I disagree (about "works just fine"). I find PEP 315 > counter-intuitive. There's multi-part blocks in Python, but they all > behave like a step-sequence where you never come back to a previous > step. What I mean is that after entering a finally/except/elif/else, > there's no coming back in the try/if/for/while. My first impression > when looking at: > > do: > <block1> > while condition: > <block2> > > is that <block1> is executed only once. Indeed. The original poster seems to want something that would work (not necessarily look) like this: do: <block> while <condition> with <block> executed once prior to <condition> first being tested. But the above is ugly, and you can get much the same effect with Python today: firsttime = True while firsttime or <condition>: <block> firsttime = False Seems fairly Pythonic to me. YMMV. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <python at discworld.dyndns.org> GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4