On 5/30/05, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Noam's suggestion seems reasonable to me, but I'm not > sure what the performance implications are. I think that they are not critical. The number of lines can grow by at most twice, because shorter words would not have a line of their own. The added rfind call seems not very significant to me, since it is preceded by about log2n string encodings, to test if an encoded prefix fits the required line length. Have a good day, Noam
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4