RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jul 21 20:55:11 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-July/054923.html

В Срд, 20/07/2005 в 21:58 -0300, Facundo Batista пишет:
> On 7/20/05, Martin Blais <martin.blais at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Well, maybe you're reading a bit too litterally into that statement.
> > To me the expression is very explicitly absent :-)    More seriously,
> > reading into these rules too literally leads to funny places: I could
> > ask why at the end of functions there is an implicit "return None"
> > (I'm not expecting an answer).  Explicit better than implicit?
> 
> See your point.
> 
> But, for me (spanish speaker), if I read a ``while:``, I think, "while what?".
> 

The same here, so -1 for while:

Ruslan

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-July/054923.html below:

[Python-Dev] while: