RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jul 16 00:09:24 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-July/054891.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 7/15/05, Ron Adam <rrr at ronadam.com> wrote:
> [several new syntax proposals]
> 
> Please stop proposing new syntax. The PEP was accepted after quite
> enough back-and-forth; there's no point opening this up yet again.

My apologies Guido.

Subtracting the inappropriate syntax suggestions leaves the following 
hopefully on-topic documentation suggestions.

It may be good to have a stronger association to "try" in the 
documentation by:

     1. Suggesting to the programmer that in many situations a with can 
be thought of as 'try with'.

     2. Reminding or clarify that a with will handle the object or 
context cleanup, but the programmer *may still* need to catch exceptions 
that are generated within the block with a "try-except" at some point.

     3. The "with" documentation could possibly be grouped with or after 
the "try" documentation as it may be easier to understand in that context.

Regards,
Ron

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-July/054891.html below:

[Python-Dev] 'With' context documentation draft (was Re: Terminology for PEP 343