"Andrew Durdin" <adurdin at gmail.com> wrote in message news:59e9fd3a050710202721851037 at mail.gmail.com... > Very likely. But given the number of times that similar proposals have > been put forth in the past, it is reasonable to expect that they will > be brought up again in the future by others, if this is rejected--and > in that case, these other can simply be pointed to a thorough (but > rejected) PEP that discusses the proposal and variants and reasons for > rejection. I agree that this would be useful. I also agree with Bob Ippolito that a new prefex might be better. tjr
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4