Paul Moore wrote: > On 7/6/05, Michael Chermside <mcherm at mcherm.com> wrote: >> Paul Moore writes: >> > I also like the fact that it offers a neat 1-word name for the >> > generator decorator, "@context". >> >> Well, ok... does anyone *else* agree? I too saw this and thought "neat! >> a simple one-word name!". But then I started worrying that it's not >> defining the *context*, but rather the *context manager*. While >> "context manager" is a term I could easily imagine associating only >> with 'with' statements, "context" is too general a term... even after >> Python supports 'with' statements I will continue to use "context" >> to mean lots of different things (eg: decimal.context). > > Actually, you're starting to persuade me... Although I generally > prefer decorator names which are single words. Along with the at-sign, > underscores make the whole thing look a little too "punctuation-heavy" > for me (and don't suggest camel case, please!). Anything against @contextmanager in analogy to @staticmethod ? Reinhold -- Mail address is perfectly valid!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4