Raymond Hettinger wrote: > On a separate note, I also propose that __exit__() be renamed to > __leave__(). The enter/leave word pairing are a better fit in standard > English: I tend to associate leave with leaving, and leaving with arriving. I didn't even think the __enter__ / __exit__ names were an issue. <shrug> Then again there's alway __premanage__ and __postmanage__. That fits Nicks requirement for visual pairing as they both start with 'p'. And then calling it a manager object fits very nicely too. Hmmm, wonder if you could implement programs based on gant charts using nested manager objects? Would the nested managers be mid-level managers? This might have some marketing appeal to large corporations. ;-) Ron
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4