[Tony Meyer] > The main question (to steal Thomas's words) is whether the > library modules should be written to help the freeze tools > - if the answer is 'yes', then I'll submit the above as a > patch for 2.5. [Martin v. Löwis] > The answer to this question certainly is "yes, if possible". In this > specific case, I wonder whether the backwards compatibility is still > required in the first place. According to PEP 291, Greg Smith and > Barry Warsaw decide on this, so I think they would need to comment > first because any patch can be integrated. [...] Thanks! I've gone ahead and submitted a patch, in that case: [ 1112812 ] Patch for Lib/bsddb/__init__.py to work with modulefinder <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1112812&group_id=5 470&atid=305470> I realise that neither of the people that need to look at this are part of the '5 for 1' deal, so I need to wait for one of them to have time to look at it (plenty of time left before 2.5 anyway) but I'll do 5 reviews for the karma anyway, today or tomorrow. =Tony.Meyer
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4