A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/051353.html below:

[Python-Dev] Improving the Python Memory Allocator

[Python-Dev] Improving the Python Memory Allocator [Python-Dev] Improving the Python Memory Allocator"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sun Jan 30 11:31:58 CET 2005
Evan Jones wrote:
> Sure. This should be done even for patches which should absolutely not 
> be committed?

Difficult question. I think the answer goes like this: "Patches that
should absolutely not be committed should not be published at all".
There are different shades of gray, of course - but people typically
dislike receiving patches through a mailing list.

OTOH, I'm guilty of committing a patch myself which was explicitly
marked as not-to-be-committed on SF, so I cannot really advise to
use SF in this case. Putting it on your own web server would be
best.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4