A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/051333.html below:

[ 1009811 ] Add missing types to__builtin__

[Python-Dev] Patch review: [ 1009811 ] Add missing types to__builtin__ [Python-Dev] Patch review: [ 1009811 ] Add missing types to__builtin__Jeff Rush jeff at taupro.com
Fri Jan 28 06:50:53 CET 2005 
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 17:24, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > Other than a vague feeling of completeness is there any reason this
> > needs to be done?  Is there anything useful that currently cannot be
> > expressed without this new module?  
> 
> That I wonder myself, too.

One reason is correct documentation.  If the code is rejected, there
should be a patch proposed to remove the erroneous documentation
references that indicates things are in __builtins_ when they are in
fact not.

If they are put into __builtins__, the documentation won't need
updating. ;-)

-Jeff Rush
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4