A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/051326.html below:

[ 1009811 ] Add missing types to__builtin__

[Python-Dev] Patch review: [ 1009811 ] Add missing types to__builtin__ [Python-Dev] Patch review: [ 1009811 ] Add missing types to__builtin__Raymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Thu Jan 27 23:52:17 CET 2005 
> > Basically, I'd like to see them be given a binding somewhere, and
have
> > their claimed module agree with that, but am not particular as to
where.
> 
> I think I cannot agree with this as a goal regardless of the
consequences.

Other than a vague feeling of completeness is there any reason this
needs to be done?  Is there anything useful that currently cannot be
expressed without this new module?  



Raymond
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4