On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:01:20 -0500, James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net> wrote: > Basically, I'd like to see them be given a binding somewhere, and have > their claimed module agree with that, but am not particular as to > where. Option #2 seemed to be rejected last time, and option #1 was > given approval, so that's what I wrote a patch for. It sounds like it's > getting pretty strong "no" votes this time around, however. Therefore, > I would like to suggest option #3, with <newmodule> being, say, > 'internals'. +1 -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4