Neal Norwitz <nnorwitz at gmail.com> writes: >> * not handling more than nine arguments, > > There are very few functions I've found that take more than 2 > arguments. Should 9 be lower, higher? I don't have a good feel. > From what I've seen, 5 may be more reasonable as far as catching 90% > of the cases. Five is probably conservative. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-February/042847.html -- KBK
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4