RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 14 19:11:01 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/051063.html

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005, Brett C. wrote:
>
> Right, it's a struct_time object; just force of habit to call it a time 
> tuple.
> 
> And I technically don't see why a fractional second attribute could not be 
> added that is not represented in the tuple.  But I personally would like to 
> see struct_tm eliminated in Py3k and replaced with datetime usage.  My wish 
> is to have the 'time' module stripped down to only the bare essentials that 
> just don't fit in datetime and push everyone to use datetime for most 
> things.

Because of people doing things like

year, month, day, hour, min, sec, junk, junk, junk = time.localtime()
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing."  --Alan Perlis

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/051063.html below:

[Python-Dev] redux: fractional seconds in strptime