On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:28:16PM -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote: | At 08:32 AM 1/14/05 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: | >I have no desire to add syntax | >complexities like this to satisfy some kind of theoretically nice | >property. | | Whether it's syntax or a decorator, it allows you to create stateless | adapters without needing to write individual adapter *classes*, or even | having an explicit notion of an "interface" to adapt to. That is, it | makes it very easy to write a "good" adapter; you can do it without even | trying. The point isn't to make it impossible to write a "bad" adapter, | it's to make it more attractive to write a good one. Phillip, May I suggest that you write this up as a PEP? Being dead in the water isn't always fatal. Right now you're ideas are still very fuzzy and by forcing yourself to come up with a narrative, semantics section, minimal implementation, and examples, you will go along way to both refining your idea and also allowing others to better understand what you're proposing. Cheers, Clark
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4