Phillip writes: > IMO, it's simpler to handle this use case by letting __conform__ return > None, since this allows people to follow the One Obvious Way to not conform > to a particular protocol. > > Then, there isn't a need to even worry about the exception name in the > first place, either... +1. Writing a default __conform__ for object is reasonable. Alex writes: > I'd rather not make a change to built-in ``object'' a prereq for PEP 246 Why not? Seems quite reasonable. Before __conform__ existed, there wasn't one for object; now that it exists, object needs one. -- Michael Chermside This email may contain confidential or privileged information. If you believe you have received the message in error, please notify the sender and delete the message without copying or disclosing it.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4