Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> writes: > I don't think that's appropriate in this case. Liskov violation is > something precise. I don't think that changing what you call it will help > beginners understand it any better in this case. I say leave it as it and > make sure it's properly documented. +1 -- KBK
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4