I wrote: > I don't see how [LiskovViolation could have a more descriptive name]. > Googling on Liskov immediately brings up clear and understandable > descriptions of the principle David writes: > Clearly, I disagree. [...] Skip writes: > I had never heard the term before and consulted the Google oracle as well. This must be one of those cases where I am mislead by my background... I thought of Liskov substitution principle as a piece of basic CS background that everyone learned in school (or from the net, or wherever they learned programming). Clearly, that's not true. Guido writes: > How about SubstitutabilityError? It would be less precise and informative to ME but apparently more so to a beginner. Obviously, we should support the beginner! -- Michael Chermside
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4