RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jan 12 16:49:20 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050909.html

[Phillip]
> As for the issue of what should and shouldn't exist in Python, it doesn't
> really matter; PEP 246 doesn't (and can't!) *prohibit* transitive
> adaptation.

Really? Then isn't it underspecified? I'd think that by the time we
actually implement PEP 246 in the Python core, this part of the
semantics should be specified (at least the default behavior, even if
there are hooks to change this).

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050909.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 246, redux