On 2005 Jan 11, at 16:34, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
...
> Anyway, I agree that your version of the code should be used to form
> the reference implementation, since the purpose of the reference
> implementation is to show the complete required semantics.
Great, one point at last on which we fully agree -- thanks Armin!-)
I was waiting for BDFL feedback before editing the PEP again, but if
none is forthcoming I guess at some point I'll go ahead and at least to
the edits that are apparently not controversial, like this one. I'd
like to have a summary of controversial points and short pro and con
args, too, but I'm not unbiased enough to write it all by myself...;-)
Alex
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4