On 7 Jan 2005, at 11:08, Bob Ippolito wrote: >>>> 10.3 or later. For older OSX releases (either because you build >>>> Python on 10.2 or earlier, or because you've set >>>> MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET to a value of 10.2 or less) we use the old >>>> behaviour of linking with "-framework Python". >>> >>> Wouldn't it be better to link with the actual dylib inside the >>> framework on 10.2? Otherwise you can no longer build 2.3 extensions >>> after you've installed 2.4. >> >> It would certainly be better to do this for 10.2. > > This patch implements the proposed direct framework linking: > http://python.org/sf/1097739 Looks good, I'll incorporate it. And as I haven't heard of any showstoppers for the -undefined dynamic_lookup (and Anthony seems to be offline this week) I'll put that in too. -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen at cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4