On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 11:33, Chermside, Michael wrote: > > Why not just subscribe to > > python-checkins and filter out everything *but* nondist/peps? > > But there are lots of people who might be interested in > following PEP updates but not other checkins. Pretty > much anyone who considers themselves a "user" of Python > not a developer. Perhaps they don't even know C. That's a > lot to filter through for such people. (After all, I > sure HOPE that only a small fraction of checkins are for > PEPs not code.) > > I'm +0 on it... but I'll mention that if such a list were > created I'd subscribe. So maybe that's +0.2 instead. As an experiment, I just added a PEP topic to the python-checkins mailing list. You could subscribe to this list and just select the PEP topic (which matches the regex "PEP" in the Subject header or first few lines of the body). Give it a shot and let's see if that does the trick. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20050106/d1ebd9f4/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4