> Why not just subscribe to > python-checkins and filter out everything *but* nondist/peps? But there are lots of people who might be interested in following PEP updates but not other checkins. Pretty much anyone who considers themselves a "user" of Python not a developer. Perhaps they don't even know C. That's a lot to filter through for such people. (After all, I sure HOPE that only a small fraction of checkins are for PEPs not code.) I'm +0 on it... but I'll mention that if such a list were created I'd subscribe. So maybe that's +0.2 instead. -- Michael Chermside This email may contain confidential or privileged information. If you believe you have received the message in error, please notify the sender and delete the message without copying or disclosing it.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4