Jack Jansen wrote: > But I do care:-) Specifically because I trust the crowd here to come up > with good ideas (even if they're not Mac users:-). Thanks a lot. > The "new" solution is basically to go back to the Unix way of building > an extension: link it against nothing and sort things out at runtime. > Not my personal preference, but at least we know that loading an > extension into one Python won't bring in a fresh copy of a different > interpreter or anything horrible like that. This sounds good, except that it only works on OS X 10.3, right? What about older versions? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4