Andrew McNamara wrote: >>>Can you please elaborate on that? What needs to be done, and how is >>>that going to be done? It might be possible to avoid considerable >>>uglification. > > > I'm not altogether sure there. The parsing state machine is all written in > C, and deals with signed chars - I expect we'll need two versions of that > (or one version that's compiled twice using pre-processor macros). Quite > a large job. Suggestions gratefully received. I'm still trying to understand what *needs* to be done - I would move to how this is done only later. What APIs should be extended/changed, and in what way? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4