At 12:29 PM 1/5/05 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: >On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:41, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > > > I think it would be reasonable to assign im_class only to functions > > defined in class scope. The only serialization that would break in that > > case is if your example had a 'del f' at the end. > >+1. If you're doing something funkier, then you can set that attribute >yourself. > >-Barry Um, isn't all this stuff going to be more complicated and spread out over more of the code than just leaving unbound methods in place?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4