RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jan 5 14:49:05 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050681.html

"Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> writes:

> Bob Ippolito wrote:
>> It doesn't for reasons I care not to explain in depth, again.
>> Search  the pythonmac-sig archives for longer explanations.  The
>> gist is that  you specifically do not want to link directly to the
>> framework at all  when building extensions.
>
> Because an Apple-built extension then may pick up a user-installed
> Python? Why can this problem not be solved by adding -F options,
> as Jack Jansen proposed?
>
>> This is not the wrong way to do it.
>
> I'm not convinced.

Martin, can you please believe that Jack, Bob, Ronald et al know what
they are talking about here?

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  Q: Isn't it okay to just read Slashdot for the links?
  A: No. Reading Slashdot for the links is like having "just one hit"
     off the crack pipe.
     -- http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/klee/misc/slashdot.html#faq

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050681.html below:

[Python-Dev] 2.3.5 schedule, and something I'd like to get in