RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jan 5 04:42:43 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050659.html

On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 18:01, Jack Jansen wrote:

> But I'm more worried about losing the other information in an unbound 
> method, specifically im_class. I would guess that info is useful to 
> class browsers and such, or are there other ways to get at that?

That would be my worry too.  OTOH, we have function attributes now, so
why couldn't we just stuff the class on the function's im_class
attribute?  Who'd be the wiser?  (Could the same be done for im_self and
im_func for backwards compatibility?)

quack-quack-ly y'rs,
-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20050104/70559f60/attachment.pgp

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050659.html below:

[Python-Dev] Let's get rid of unbound methods