RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jan 4 20:44:43 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050639.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [Jim]
> 
>>We'll still need unbound builtin methods, so the concept won't
>>go away. In fact, the change would mean that the behavior between
>>builtin methods and python methods would become more inconsistent.
> 
> 
> Actually, unbound builtin methods are a different type than bound
> builtin methods:

Of course, but conceptually they are similar.  You would still
encounter the concept if you got an unbound builtin method.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim at zope.com       Python Powered!
CTO                  (540) 361-1714            http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation     http://www.zope.com       http://www.zope.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050639.html below:

[Python-Dev] Let's get rid of unbound methods