Brett C. wrote: > Walter Dörwald wrote: > >> Brett C. wrote: >> >>> Walter Dörwald wrote: >>> >>>> M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> I don't have a clear picture of what the consensus currently >>>>> looks like :-) >>>>> >>>>> If we're going for for a solution that implements the hook >>>>> awareness for all __<typename>__ hooks, I'd be +1 on that. >>>>> If we only touch the __unicode__ case, we'd only be created >>>>> yet another special case. I'd vote -0 on that. [SNIP] > Since this is a semantic change probably need Guido to OK this? ... which we now have. Assigned the patch to myself. I will get to it eventually. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4