A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051709.html below:

[Python-Dev] Requesting that a class be a new-style class

[Python-Dev] Requesting that a class be a new-style class [Python-Dev] Requesting that a class be a new-style classRaymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Sun Feb 20 04:46:40 CET 2005
> > > This is something I've typed way too many times:
> > >
> > > Py> class C():
> > >    File "<stdin>", line 1
> > >      class C():
> > >              ^
> > > SyntaxError: invalid syntax
> > >
> > > It's the asymmetry with functions that gets to me - defining a
> > > function with no arguments still requires parentheses in the
> > > definition statement, but defining a class with no bases requires
the
> > > parentheses to be omitted.
> 
> It's fine to fix this in 2.5. 

Yea!


Raymond
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4