Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> writes:
> [Michael Hudson]
>> ...
>> Well, I fixed it on reading the bug report and before getting to
>> python-dev mail :) Sorry if this duplicated your work, but hey, it was
>> only a two line change...
>
> Na, the real work was tracking it down in the bowels of Zope's C-coded
> security machinery -- we'll let you do that part next time <wink>.
>
> Did you add a test to ensure this remains fixed?
Yup.
> A NEWS blurb (at least for 2.4.1 -- the test failures under 2.4 are
> very visible in the Zope world, due to auto-generated test runner
> failure reports)?
No, I'll do that now. I'm not very good at remembering NEWS blurbs...
Cheers,
mwh
--
6. The code definitely is not portable - it will produce incorrect
results if run from the surface of Mars.
-- James Bonfield, http://www.ioccc.org/2000/rince.hint
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4