RetroSearch Browse

Thu Feb 17 15:15:46 CET 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051619.html

Peter Astrand wrote:
> I'd like to have your opinion on this bug. Personally, I'd prefer to keep
> test_no_leaking as it is, but if you think otherwise...
> 
> One thing that actually can motivate that test_subprocess takes 20% of the
> overall time is that this test is a good generic Python stress test - this
> test might catch some other startup race condition, for example.

test_decimal has a short version which tests basic functionality and always 
runs, but enabling -udecimal also runs the specification tests (which take a 
fair bit longer).

So keeping the basic subprocess tests unconditional, and running the long ones 
only if -uall or -usubprocess are given would seem reasonable.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at email.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-February/051619.html below:

[Python-Dev] [ python-Bugs-1124637 ] test_subprocess is far too slow (fwd)